<a style="color:#000" href="https://www.tugraz.at/institute/ittm">Institute of Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics</a></br><a href="https://www.tugraz.at">Graz University of Technology</a> https://aeroenginesafety.tugraz.at/ 2026-05-26T06:36:44+00:00 https://aeroenginesafety.tugraz.at/ https://aeroenginesafety.tugraz.at/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=wiki:logo.png text/html 2022-05-16T17:31:45+00:00 Anonymous (anonymous@undisclosed.example.com) https://aeroenginesafety.tugraz.at/doku.php?id=17:173:1732:1732&rev=1652722305&do=diff 17.3.2 Destructive Testing <a id="destructive-testing"></a> Differentiating destructive testing from non-destructive testing appears simple at first glance, but is actually not always so clear. Of course, tests in which the part is destroyed, altered in a way that makes its later use impossible, or has samples taken from it, should be classified as destructive. However, what about tests that only preclude reuse in case of insufficient part quality? One example of this is glass shot peening as…