Table of Contents
23.1.3 Prevention and remedies of anti friction bearing failures. Failure investigation and assessment
For anti friction bearings applieds generally: A targeted and successful remedy demands the knowledge of the causative influences (Fig. "Failure modes and appearances for identifications 1"). However this can be, different as to expect from many published systematics, just for anti friction bearings more difficult than for many other mechine elements (Fig. "Bearing failure by Interaction with accessories"). For success, we must direct over sufficient knowledge about the symptoms and specific loads of the particular application. These must be identified and evaluated.
- Symptoms of a, no more from the appearance analysable bearing failure (Fig. "Hints at bearing problems"). To thesebelongs the intensity of vibrations, time lapse and distribution, shocks from surges (Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss")as well as temperatures. If possible these allow also, after a destruction ot the bearing, conclusionsat the causes like unbalances.
- Display of instruments in the cockpit, if possible elektronially stored redable data (Fig. "Identificatgion techniques of bearing failures").
- Indications in the lubrication oil: Chips, fatigue break-outs (pittings). Contaminations in the oil(filter, magnetic plugs, Fig. "Conclusions by trend of particle amount") which can trigger a failure. (Fig. "Ol filter helping for diagnistics", 22.3.3.1-4 andIll. 23.1.3-2). Evaluation of the failure progression accordant the trend of the chip depositionrate (Fig. "Specifications for oil contaminations") and/or of the metal content in the oil (Fig. "Conclusions by trend of particle amount").
- Identification of the concerned component/bearing on the basis of chemical analysis from the chips(Fig. "Conclusions by trend of particle amount") and/or the oil (Fig. "Specifications for oil contaminations").
- Analysis of the traces on the bearing races (Fig. "What rece tracks of bearings can tell" and Fig. "Bearing features and terms 1").
- Analysis of the bearing seats of the intensity and distribution e.g., of fretting or rotation on theshaft (Fig. "Bearing features and terms 1").
- Identification of damages by an assembly process (volume 1, Ill. 4.3-6).
- Knowledge/understanding of the oil system (Fig. "Oil system components", Ill. 22.3-6.1 and Fig. "Metallic contaminations in oil show problems") and interactiveinfluence during a bearing failure.
- Knowledge/understanding of possible failure relevant weak points of the concerned aeroenginetype (Fig. "Oil deficiency shaft failure sequence 1").
Are the causes known, measures respectively remedies can be developed and introduced. At operational overloads improved bearings and/or load decreasing measures may be used (Fig. "Hints at bearing problems" and volume 2, Ill. 7.2.1-3). Problems with the supply of lubrication oil (Fig. "Oil deficiency shaft failure sequence 1") must be targeted approached in the system. Typical, example is the coking in the bearing area (Fig. "Problema by heat soaking", Fig. "Importance of resting time at idle" and Fig. "Oil coaking endangers main bearings").
Fig. "Hints at bearing problems" (Lit. 23.1.3-1 up to Lit. 23.1.3-5): For aeroengines it is already a success, if
symptoms are identified, to indicate the problems of a bearing if possible
before its failure (Fig. "Identificatgion techniques of bearing failures").
During and outside the operation, direct or indirect observed anomalies at a bearing can give
the experienced specialist hints at the problem. Thereby it can be concluded at already existing
bearing failures and causative influences. This task is
especially demanding, because most of the
symptoms can have different reasons. The combination of several anomalies can markedly increase the
certainity of the conclusion. (Fig. "Engine health management"). In the most cases, only a
first evaluation of the situation is
possible, however it can not replace a failure
investigation (volume 4, Ill. 17.1-11).
A high bearing temperature is a sign, that a failure is dangerously far progressed and/or the
bearing runs under unusual service conditions. Therefore there is little chance to identify the failure in
time before a failing of the bearing. At main
bearings the oil temperature can give a hint. A
conclusion at the concerned bearing is hardly possible without additional observations like
chip deposition rate (Fig. "Monitoring particle formation in oil") or vibrations
(Fig. "Condition indicator using vibration sensors"). Unusual high temperatures of the bearings from accessory
gears can be identified by outer discolourations
of the casings/boxes or escaping oil during stand still
within maintenence processes, can be caused from a
deteriorated seal (Fig. "Problems of radial sealing rings"). In most cases
a dangerous bearing temperature is the result of friction heat. This condition can be expected in
the endphase of a bearing failure (Fig. "Bearing behaviour by guidance of the cage" up to Fig. "Oscillation of the rollers sc skewing weaving").
High service temperatures as failure cause can develop in different ways:
- Unsufficient oil supply, e.g., if the oil supply is blocked by coking of pipe lines (Fig. "Oil coaking endangers main bearings") and/or oil jets/nozzles or because a leak (Fig. "Oil deficiency shaft failure sequence 1").
- Too high oil temperature, e.g. as consequence of an unsufficient oil cooling or the failing of the thermal insulation of a bearing schamber in the hot part region. In the extreme case, oilfire can heat the bearing short-term up to a failure (volume 2, Ill. 9.2-2).
- Overloading of the bearing by unusual operation conditions like high unbalances. Typical trigger is a blade fracture. Further causes are extreme axial loads, caused by a labyrinth failure (volume 2, Ill. 7.2.1-2).
- Design caused too high bearing loads.
- Dimensional problems at the bearing itself, e.g. too small bearing clearance (Fig. "Skidding by unsuitable bearing tolerances") or at the bearing seats (Fig. "Avoidubg skidding with oval race tracks").
Noise: The high noise level of an aeroengine may prevent during operation this identification
possibility of a failure. However, during maintenance work, unusual
noises during rotating of the rotors, may allow the suggestion at the beginning of a failure. However the assignment may be problematic,
for other formation possibilities like rubbing.
Vibrations can be an informative indication of a bearing failure. The casings of aeroengines usually
are supplied with several acceleration/vibration sensors, which warn, when an acceleration limit is
passed (Fig. "Elements of a vibration monitoring" and Ill. 25.2.1-9). Is in an aeroengine type a bearing
identified as weak point with, during the failure occurring
vibrations (Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss", location at the aeroengine, Fig. "Condition indicator using vibration sensors"),
this allows more exact conclusions.Are vibration frequencies measured by the sensors, the chance exists,
to conclude at the concerned shaft/rotor system.
Increased friction, torque moments can show during an advanced main bearing failure in a
markedly braking/drag of the rotor (Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss"). Thereby the
normal operation speed will not be reached
and/or the rotor behaves during acceleration markedly
dull. In this connection, surging of the
compressor is an additional indication.
During stand still and maintenence work, an unusual heavy rotating/turning of the rotor can
get noticeable. However, in most cases this may be rather traced back at a rubbing of blades or
labyrinths from other causes. In a very seldom case of a bearing failure this is an indirect feature. It can be
only expected, when the degree of the failure no more allows a sufficient centering of the rotor. However,
in such a case further indications like
chips must be expected.
Advanced bearing failures, like fatigue (pittings) of the race tracks, can show during stand stillto
the attentive visitor. So a rough running and
jerky decelerations (at locally fatigue/pits at the
circumference of the bearing) can attract the attention during slow rotating/turning of the rotor.
Trapping/jamming, especially of main shafts, may in the most seldom cases caused by a bearing
failure. Anyway, a hint is, if this condition does not disappear even after a totally cooling down of the
aeroengine. Then the usual jamming by heat expansion can be ruled out (volume 2, Ill. 7.1.2-9).
Vibration fatigue (Fretting) can be hardly identified at a bearing from the outside. It
concentrates primarily at the seat surfaces. Indirectly however, a bearing failure caused by
vibrations (e.g., rotor bending) and/or alignment
problems can act on neighbouring
components. Especially spline toothings on shafts can show markedly wear (Fig. "Damage influences at multispline shafts").
Oil leak and smoke formation are often secondary failures/symptoms of a bearing failing (Ill.
23.1.2-3). Thereby, oil escapes through damaged neighboured seals
(e.g., bearing chambers). Unusual traces of
oil coking in compressor and hot part can be first hints. In an extreme case, an from outside
good visible oil fire occurrs (Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss"). Alarming escape of oil at seals of accessory gears can be
caused by the failing of the bearing from a drive/power shaft to the devices.
Drop of the oil pressure is registered from warning
signals/displays. It can be the consequence of
a bearing failure. Reasons are blocked/clogged filters and sieves or damaged
seals. In every case the failure of the bearing propagated to the total breakdown.
Oil analysis indicate in many cases the development of a failure, before a catastrophic breakdown
(Fig. "Specifications for oil contaminations" and Fig. "Material specific particle content in oil"). Chapter 22.3.4 deals in detail with this issue.
The indication of the magnetic plug and chip
detektors are very helpful for the early
indentification and identifying of bearing failures (Fig. "Monitoring particle formation in oil").
Fig. "Identificatgion techniques of bearing failures" (Lit. 23.1.3-6 and Lit. 23.1.3-7): The
failure development at anti friction
bearings, usually takes place (fatigue of the race, vibration fatigue/fretting) exponential after an
incubation period (diagram). Therefore the best chance, to identify a failure is during the incubation period of
the failure (Fig. "Hints at bearing problems"). This chance grows with the
trend to more monitoring sensors in
combination with the use of computers (Fig. "Data Fusion and information fusion" and Fig. "Engine health monitoring with data fusion"). So it gets possible, to evaluate
different sensor data combined and to make the conclusion more certain (Fig. "Engine health management").
The „moment of detection “ decides about:
- Degree of the failure respectively its risk.
- Immediate measures like shut down of the aeroengine.
- Interpretability of the failure and with thissufficiens certain determination of the cause.
- Sustainable effective remedies. To these belongsthe guarantee of a sufficient oil supply or theavoidance of coking by `heat soaking' (Ill.22.3.2-6.1 and Fig. "Importance of resting time at idle").
The main phases of a bearing failure and possible features for detection are summarised in the chart.
Early detection means, that the failure will be
sufficient early identified. This means, before the
failure triggers secondary failures on other components and/or affects the behaviour of the aeroengine.
Typica, features are
- characteristic particles in the oil (Fig. "Ol filter helping for diagnistics" and Fig. "What deposits of magnet plugs can tell") and the
- tendency of the frequency (Fig. "Conclusions by trend of particle amount").
- Unusual high frequency vibrationes and
- Acoustic emission without surpassing the limits (Fig. "Elements of a vibration monitoring").
- Extremely meaningful would be the possibility to monitor the rotation speed of the cage from a critical main bearing (Lit. 23.1.3-6). Speeds, which drop far below the kinematic are a sign for high friction forces (Fig. "Forces and moments inside a bearing"). These develop during „skidding” (cage slip, Fig. "Deterioration by cage slipping so called skidding") or at a cage, which is dangerously draged at the guidance (Fig. "Bearing behaviour by guidance of the cage").
A late identification occurres, if there is already the
dropout of the bearing function. This mis
especially likely for high speed bearings of small
aeroengines (e.g., helicopters). Here, the failure
development from the first sign to the breakdown needs only
seconds. The indications are linked with a dropout
of the bearing functions, which can reach up to a
catastrophic aeroengine failure. To these belong unusual intense vibrations (acceleration data above the limits). The frequencies are in the range of the rotor speeds.
For example shut down warnings can be triggered from the bearing itself or from secondary failure at other compomnents. To these belong
- oil fire with high unbalances, fracture of the rotor (shaft, disks, volume 2, Ill. 9.2-13).
- Distinct rubbing processes with secondary failures at the blading and seals.
Shut downs are based on instrument displays and warning signals. Not least decides the pilot with consideration of instructions and manual. Typical warnings are:
- Drop of the oilpressure.
- Unacceptable intense vibrations.
- Fire warning.
- Not influenced drop of rotation speed or unusual dull acceleration behaviour of rotors (Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss"). In this connection compressor surge.
- Axial rotor displacement during failing of a thrust bearing (volume 1, Ill. 4.5-4). Triggering of the shut down automatic (volume 1, Ill. 4.5-8).
Fig. "Conclusions by trend of particle amount" (Lit. 23.1.3-7): Particles in the oil, in filters and/or on
magnetic plugs/magnetic detectors can in manifold aspects add to the
determination of the failure cause (Ill.22.3.4-1). The certainty
can be if necessary improved with the combination of the single evidences (Fig. "Engine health management" and Fig. "Engine health monitoring with data fusion").
Lapse of time: The trend (diagrams above) of the gain
of failure caused particles (fatigue
break-outs, chips) points at
- Type of the failure mechanism: Fatigue, wear.
- Beginning of the deteriorating influence: e.g., assembly, oil change, transport, special operation loads.
Is the bearing failure not announced with the formation of particles, respectively arises
spontaneous, this allows to suggest causes like
- sudden overload, e.g., during high unbalances because of a blade fracture or intense surge impulses (Fig. "Bearing fractures by shock loads").
- Shortage of oil as cause for a self-energising heating with failing of the bearing.
- At very high-speed bearings, like of gasturbines of little power, also a fatigue failure can lead seemingly abrupt to the total destruction of the bearing.
Chemical analysis of the particles permit the identification of the primary concerned component/bearing in the oil system (Fig. "Material specific particle content in oil" and Fig. "Failure modes and appearances for identifications 1"). For this there help can be found in
manuals, which assign analysis of materials and components (Fig. "Specifications for oil contaminations"). The
chronological appearance of particles from the parts of a bearing (cage, bearing rings, rolling elements) or other components
(e.g., gear wheels, seals) can enable the differentiation between primary and secondary
failures as well as conclusions at the development of
secondary failures.
Shape/form and outer features of the particles caused by the failure
are often characteristic for the failure mechanism during the formation (Fig. "Ol filter helping for diagnistics" and Fig. "What deposits of magnet plugs can tell"). For example, fatigue
(sketch below right) and fretting (sketches below left) can be distinguished.
Particles as failure cause: To these belong hard ceramic contaminations like from blasting/peening
or chipped off hard faces of labyrinth tips (Fig. "Dangerous particle sources in bearings", volume 2, Ill. 7.2.2-3.1). Those can be identfied
at their appearance and with analysis (Fig. "Ol filter helping for diagnistics").
Fig. "Clarification of failure needed remedies": If the bearing of an aeroengine failed, it is frequently so destroyed
(Fig. "Bearuing failure by overheating"), that a sufficient conclusion about the failure
mechanism, only from the indications of the part, is
no more possible. Especially problematic are bearings, which are operated at the limit of their loading
capacity (mechanical, thermal). Seemingly little influences, separate or in combination, can complicate
a successful cause analysis also for the experienced expert up to unsolvability. This show cases in
which only after a multitude of dangerous parallel
cases within years, a successful clarification
and/or measures was possible (Fig. "Secondary effects of bearing failues" and Fig. "Compressor surge by oil loss"). Therfore all possibilities for the solution,
especially the sourcing, must be used. That applies as well for the consequences for other components
(e.g., control units) and the aeroengine (e.g., operation behaviour), as also for all possible
concerned components of the oil system. So it is of crucial importance, to analyse
stored operation data very exactly, also for seemingly marginal features (Fig. "Monitoring parameters" and Fig. "Data Fusion and information fusion"). Its evidence must be
systematic analysed and evaluated, with the indication of the components of the oil system. Therefore it
is understandable that, before the investigation, no changes at the oil
system are carried out. To these belongs the
exchange or the removal of oil and filters. Also the
disassembly and the cleaning of the parts must happen only in presence and/or with the approval of the responsible for the investigation.
Displays of instruments and warning signals
(Fig. "Hints at bearing problems"): Primarily concerned is the monitoring
of vibrations, oil pressure, oil temperature and rotor speeds. They give hints at the failure
beginning, occurrence and its sequence. So they permit conclusions at the cause.
Also deposits in the oil system, outside the magnetic plugs, filters and sieves can give as well
important hints about the failure cause, as also about the failure sequence.
At the cause can point indications for a
blocking of the oil supply (e.g., coke formation) and
foreign particles (e.g., from seals, overhaul).
Layers of deposits can enable conclusions at the
failure sequence. They can be expectend in
'eddy water zones' or where inert forces (centrifugal forces) enable a
deposition of layers over the time (volume 1, Ill. 4.5-13). Concerned are zones like
- corners of bearing chambers and
- gear casings/boxes,
- Oil „catchers“ (bords) on shafts and bearings,
- Oil feedings in shafts (Fig. "Secondary effects of bearing failues").
The investigation of such deposits demands an adapted
preparation. To this belongs the removal
of the oil residues, embedding of the layered sample and the making of a cross section for the
microscopic (matellographic) investigations.
Does this succeed, conclusions about causytive foreign particles, failure sequence, primary
failing bearing element (e.g., cage or rolling surfaces) and
failure mechanisms can be expected.
Surface/appearance and structure of coke deposits
(Fig. "Formation conditions shown by coke deposits" and Fig. "Formation mechanisms and oil coke features") can be
analysed for the type of origin (oil fire) and development conditions (droplets, vapour, during stand still,
high temperatures; Ill. in the chapter about oil). The
position of the coke formation gives hints at
the associated operation condition (e.g., stand still, Fig. "Oil coaking endangers main bearings") and/or unusual conditions/causes
like failing of a thermal bearing chamber insulation.
Deposits in fresh oil (pressure oil) lines and oil jets
must be taken especially earnest. Because of
the prepositioned filters, there is a high likelihood of a primary effect. At first it must be checked, if
they explain a causative dirsurbance of the oil flow.
Further the question arises, if the deposits (mostly oil coke) on site (e.g., in a feed line or oil jet,
Fig. "Oil coaking endangers main bearings") here developed or have been washed.
Also an indication of the scavenge oil (return
oil) lines os of interest. Scavenge oil lines can get
during operation or stand still such high temperatures, that dangerous coke formation occurs. Cause is
heat from the outside (radiation, convection) and an unsufficient inner heat dissipation (temporary low
flow rate, foam). Coke acts insulating and accelerates the process. A constricted cross section can retain
oil in the bearing chamber, up to the overheating of the bearing and ignition of the oil. Unnormal
annealing colours or oxidation of the pipe outside point at an oil fire that continues through the scavenge
pipe (volume 2, Ill. 9.2-10). In this connection, leakages in scavenge lines must be mentioned. Does
here occur a hot gas intrusion, from experience, this can trigger an
oil fire with extremely high pipe temperatures.
The investigation of the remains in oil filters and oil
sieves will be discussed in detail in Ill.
22.3.3.1-2. They have the potential for conclusions about
failure triggering influences (e.g.,
nonmagnetic foreign paticles) and failure
sequence.
Deposits at magnetic plugs and magnetic chip
detectors are the issue of Fig. "What deposits of magnet plugs can tell". Because
magnetic particles are concerned, these frequently origin are from the affected bearing. Therefore they are
of special interest for the failure
mechanism (fatigue, wear processes).
Meaningful investigations of
oil samples require, that after the failure occurred,
no oil was changed, repoured or drained.
Oil samples are suitable to gather at failure specific areas of the oil system. Of special interest are hints
at the amount of oil/oil loss, oil type, aging condition (Fig. "Formation of depositions in hot oil systems") and contaminations. Thereby
the operation time must be considered.
Fig. "What rece tracks of bearings can tell" (Lit. 23.1.3-1, Lit. 23.1.3-8 up to Lit. 23.1.3-10):
Race tracks on rings and rolling elements of anti friction bearings
are indeed no failures, but can give important hints about
height and direction of the acting loads. In contrast to areas with fatigue pittings (Fig. "Bearing features and terms 1") they are
no feature of a material damage.
Shape, progression and distribution
on the races, that differ from the, according to the design, even alignment are however an indication for a
hurtful load distribution.
This is determined by
- Direction of the force.
- Changes of the force (e.g. unbalances),
- Measurement deviations like misalignmentsand inclines in connection with the bearing seats.
- Deformations like distortion of casings or flexing of shafts.
Typical macroscopic feature of a race track is a polished/reflective surface. During
microscopic examination a plastic leveling of normal tool
marks is normal. Also shallow run in pittigs show
the track and must not be a reason for concern (Fig. "Mechanisms of rolling wear"). But do they exceed an, according to
the experience, bearing specific tolerable extent, they can count as an early indication for a short
dimensioned lifetime. In this case, a non destructive (internal stresses, Fig. "Internal stresses at the racetrac", Lit 23.1.3-9) and/or
destructive investigation for signs of
fatigue (Fig. "Gathering informations about bearing failures") can be necessary for a
risk assessment (Fig. "Gathering informations about bearing failures" and Fig. "Internal stresses at the racetrac").
Remarkable are indications of race
damages. To those belong indentations of
particles (Fig. "Reduction of bearing lifetime by particles") or first appearances for
skidding of the roller elements (Fig. "Skidding failure modes at races").
Fig. "Bearing features and terms 1" (Lit. 23.1.3-6, Lit. 23.1.3-11 and Lit. 23.1.3-12 ): In this survey typical
macroscopic manifestations and attributes
of antifriction bearing failures are assigned to the causes. This is for
an understanding of the technical terms for a better understanding of instructions in specifications
and manuals. Above that an assistance for failure investigations
should be given.
Identification of the failure cause with help of the failure mode/appearance.
Fig. "Failure modes and appearances for identifications 1" (Lit. 23.1.3-8): Correlation of operation features and failure
features with failure mechanismy respectively causes.
Fig. "Gathering informations about bearing failures" (Lit. 23.1.3-13): For the failure investigation as
deterioration proof and evaluation of the mechanical operation
load and with this for a risk
assessment a metallographical
investigation (volume 4, Ill. 17.3.2-6) in the area for the race track (Fig. "What rece tracks of bearings can tell") can be helpful.
Internal stresses/residual stresses (volume 4, Ill. 16.2.2.4-21) on the race track can suppport the conclusions (Ill.
23.1.3-9).
However it shoult be pointed at the
difficulties, to make explicite
statements. This can be explained with the interaction of shear stresses and normal stresses (combined stress) as well as peak stresses
in the region of the race track surface (Fig. "Stresses between rolling elements and race"). Here act factors like
lack of lubrication, unfavourable surface condition, slip
of the rolling elements and contaminations of the lubrication
oil.
Depending from the operation time and the bearing loads respectively stresses, a suitable
prepared/etched cross microsection, shows typical evaluable features which can be assessed as
signs of fatigue:
Dark etching areas (= DEAs) appear after the etching in the region of the race track (sketch
above, axial cut). They get with the operation time darker and larger. Also over the time develop angular
to the surface arranged so called white bands
(WBs, detail above), up to few tenth of a millimeter
deep, which can be identified in a circumferential section. After this form, nearer to the surface
additional white bands, with a steeper orientation. Obviously the WBs are a
ferrit formation from the hardening
structure (martensite breakdown). With this the
drop of the hardness in these zones can be
explained (diagram). So, if there is sufficient experience with the particular use of the anti friction bearing,
this hardness can make statements about the operation load.
„Butterflies” must be basically distinguished from WBs. Obviously it is not
annealed martensit caused by a „heat explosion“ from a short locally deformation. So is understandable their
higher hardness as the not influenced material. Characteristic also for the name is their form, rememberig a
butterfly (sketch below). Its angle of orientation to the surface depends from the
thickness of the lubricant film and roughness of the race. During full EHL (Fig. "Micropittings and life time"), i.e. width of the lubrication gap larger
than the added roughness of both opposed rolling surfaces, an angle of about 30° to the race track
arises. The angle is smaller, if mixed friction exists. Here obviously more pronounced circumferential
friction forces become noticeable. These features offer the chance to conclude at bearing loads.
Butterflies develop first if a load threshold is
exceeded, which triggers slip processes in the
microregion of the material (plastic deformations). These concentrate on small
material typical structure notches (no failures!) like carbides. Often these can be well identified (sketch below). Size and formation of
the butterflies depend from loading and overruns.
Fig. "Internal stresses at the racetrac"
Fig. "Internal stresses at the racetrac" (Lit. 23.1.3-1 and Lit. 23.1.3-13): In the race are, already before the operation
caused rolling events, internal stresses
from the production process. These develop during the heat
treating/hardening (sketch left) and the machining of the surface (grinding, honing). The
honing of the finishing seems to have an especially strong influence on region near the surface.
Develop slippages in the micro region during rolling over (Fig. "Gathering informations about bearing failures"), the existing internal
stresses change. There are two reasons
- Locally plastic deformations (slippages) with hindrance of the deformation by the surrounding, only elastically deformed material.
- Changes of the material structure (Fig. "Gathering informations about bearing failures"). Residual austenite in martensite and/or martensite formation from locally „temperature flashes”. Cause are fast locally inner plastic deformations or slippage processes during sliding (skidding) with metallic contact (Fig. "Skidding failure modes at races").
The circumperential and axial internal stresses in the region of the race track depend from the load
and are normally not equal. They can differ as well in hight, as also in type (tension or
compression). Thereby they also change with the dirstance to the surface.
With the number overuns, e.g., the operation time the trend of the internal stresses
changes characteristically over the distance to the race surface. Compression stresses in rolling direction
reach a stress maximum below the surface (diagram right). These seem to be a loading creiteria. But
they obviously have also a certain protective effect against
fatigue.
Fig. "High bearing loadings need fine oil flters" (Lit. 23.1.3-14 and Lit. 23.1.3-15): The bearing life is shortened by particles in the oil (Macpherson curve in Diagram above right). This is the case, if these bridge the lubrication gap (frame above left, Fig. "Micropittings and life time" up to 23.1.1-8). It comes to indentations and burials in the race surfaces (Fig. "Reduction of bearing lifetime by particles"). At these notches, the fatigue of the race begins. The deteriorating particle size depends from:
- Dimension of the bearing/bearing diameter(diagrams below),
- Bearing type: Ball bearing (diagram below left) or roller bearing (diagram below right),
- Bearing load respectively width of thelubrication gap,
- Bearing capacity of the oil (Fig. "Lubrication oils").
Because the bearing life depends so markedly from the possible maximum partocle size in the oil, the fine-meshing of the fresh (pressure) oil is of relevant meaning. With a trend to increasing temperatures and bearing loads, as well as more thin fluid oil, also the maximum tolerable particles get smaller. I.e. the filters must get always finer.
Fig. "Secondary failures by using plastic cages": The strength of the cage of high speed bearings can markedly influence the fail safe behaviour in case of a failure. Is the bearing shocklike loaded (Fig. "Bearing fractures by shock loads") during a sudden high unbalance (e.g., blade fracture), extreme stesses in the cage will occur. A too weak cage will fracture. As consequence rolling elements can gather at one side. With this, the shaft comes free. The result are high unbalances with the danger of overloading the shaft (plastic deformation, fracture; sketches below). The experience shows, that such secondary failures must be expected especially at bearings with plastic material cages and/or with a weak riveting. Because for this reason, comparatively cheap so called spindle ball bearings, as they are used for high speedn prodiction machines (e.g., grinding machines), in spite of high „D x n values“ are not suitable for the use in aeroengines. Also for test rigs (e.g., for spin tests or aerodynamic tests) because of the potential danger of extensive secondary failures, there must be an advise against the use.
Fig. "Avoidubg skidding with oval race tracks" (Lit. 23.1.3-16 and Lit. 23.1.3-17): The disposition for skidding (Fig. "Deterioration by cage slipping so called skidding") can be avoided by design.
- Decrease of the roller number, to increase the load on the individual roller.
- Smaller rollers to decrease the centrifugal force so they don't take off from the inner ring.
- Smaller radial clearance, to load more rollers at a stiff outer ring and casing.
- Centering of the cage at the rotating brearing ring.
- Most effective is an increase of the radial load. To this belongs the specification of a minimum unbalance.
The radial load can be achieved with a
tensioning, acting as preload. This can be realised with
special non-circular geometries of the race from the outer ring. Usually it is
elliptical or „triple
arched” (sketches above).
The elliptical configurations with symmetrical opposing
preload zones has the disadvantage to tend
to instability. This is avoided with the triple arched version.
The ovality/noncircularity of the outer ring can be achieved in different ways (middle sketches).
Depending of the bearing ring or the seat in the bearing casing/bearing support has the noncircularity. For
this also suitable is an elastic deformation. This needs an
adjustment of the stiffness from casing and bearing ring.
Configuration „A“: Cylindrical race, oval seat. The oval shape is achieved with an
elastic deformation of the outer ring during force fitting into the casing. Thereby the preload depends from:
- Radial clearance of the bearing,
- Distribution of the wall thickness from the outerring.
- Fit between ring and seat.
- Differences in stiffness between support/casingand bearing ring.
Configuration „B”: The whole outer ring with constant cross section has an
elliptic shape. The preload exists already in the disassembled
condition. It depends from:
- Noncircularity of the non tentioned outer ring,
- Radial clearance of the bearing.
- Stiffness of both bearing rings.
- Fit between bearing seat and outer ring.
Because of the nonuniform contact, the bearing seat tends to a crawling
movement. This can cause fretting wear. Against this helps a
locking device against rotation (e.g., noses, Fig. "Bearing fractures by shock loads").
An advantage of this version is a certain play between outer ring and
seat, which adjusts differences in thermal
expansions. Especially if the bearing outer ring will expand unexpected strong through heating.
Configuration „C“is a combination of „A” and „B“: Cylindrical ring surface and elliptical
face surface. With this, the bearing is already tensioned before the
assembly. Additionally the pretension depends from:
- Radial play of the bearing.
- Stiffnesses of the outer ring and the casing/support.
- Fit between bearing outer ring and seat surface.
So the bearing can sit suifficient tight in the casing, without markedly influencing the tensioning.
This manner saves an, for „B” necessary, locking device.
The sketch below left shows an application of a „triple arched“ bearing configuration. The
diagrams below right show the roller load in two different directions, at a respectively same radial load.
In diagram above the radial load acts in the region of a tensening zone (210° position), in the
diagram below in a recess (150°).
Fig. "Gloves to avoid swet by handling bearings" (Lit. 23.1.3-18): The
assembly and disasembly as well as the handling of the
anti friction bearings is demanding. For this basics must be considered:
Assembly/mounting: New parts and already run parts should be stored with a
corrosion protection oil (conservation oil). Usually mineral oils are applied. Mineral oils don't agree normally synthetic oils
(Fig. "Lubrication oils"). So it should, corresponding to the manual instruction,
removed as short as possible before the
assembly.
Basically the devices and tools, specified in instructions respectively manuals, must be used. Are
interim solutions concerned, are they worn or
damaged, an application should be ruled
out.
If the bearings, respectively its components, must be cooled for the mouting (heat
expansion) or heated, the specified temperature limits must be
kept. The temperature control must be carried out,
accordant the indicated method (e.g., oven, hot surface, inductive, oil bath).
Time sequences must be kept very exactly (see also Fig. "Influence of shrink fitting with spline toothing 1"). For example, too high temperatures can
decrease the bearing hardness unacceptable. For this reason, for bearings of the normal engineering, the temperature must be
limited at 100 °C. In no case use torchs for welding or brazing. For
supercooling (e.g.,with alcohol or dry ice) of the outer ring,
condensate during the assembly must bre expected. Also here the
mouting time must be kept, to prevent a unacceptable heating. Because of its corrosive effect this humidity must be removed.
During cleaning, don't use fibrilating
cloths.
Pay attention during pushing together roller bearings (e.g., joining of modules), that no
mechanical damages occur (Fig. "Critical joining of big engine modules 2").
Disassembly: Before all required tools and devices must be on hand. A
reuse and/or later inspection/investigation can demand an other approach than the exchange with the
scrapping of the bearing.
Handling and storage: For new bearings, because of the danger of corrosion, specified suitable
gloves (cotton) must be used.
The handling must be carried out with the necessary carefulness
to ban damages and contamonations.
Corrosion due to hand perspiration/sweat
can be identified in some cases by the
distribution of tiny corrosion dots (Ill. below). The failure mode correlates the sweat droplets of a finger print.
After a disassembly, respectively the inspection, the bearings which are destined for reuse, must
be cleaned as specified. After this, a
conservation must be carried out as fast as
possible. Then the bearing must be stored in a specified
container/wrapper. Bins must be closed at once after the removal.
The storage room must accord the instructions/specifications (e.g., constant temperature, low humidity).
Approach in the case of a failure:
- Photografic documentation of single steps.
- Description of the bearing condition.
- Notes about the assembly/ mounting situation.
- Suitable marks of the mounting positions.
- Observations of possible causes.
- Condition of the surrounding of the bearing(e,g., contaminations, coke formation) and of the seals.
- Oil samples (gather at the right spots!) and ifneeded of contaminations/deposits (according the specification and consulting the investigator).
- Don't clean a bearing before investigation.Before cleaning, first inform the Investigator.
- No disassembly of the bearing without consultation.
References
23.1.3-1 H.J.Böhmer, „Wälzverschleiß und -ermüdung von Bauteilen und Maßnahmen
zu ihrer Einschränkung”, Zeitschrift „Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik“,
29 (1998), page 697-713.
23.1.3-2 Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), Air Safety Occurrence
200003399, Technical Analysis Report „Examination of PT6A-67R Number-1 Bearing
and Components”, Incident vom 13. August 2000, page 1-5.
23.1.3-3 „ALPA warns Pilots on IAE V2500-A5 Bearings“, Air Safety Link,
www.alpa.org, Document D=4428, August 2003, page 1 and 2.
23.1.3-4 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Docket No. 2003-NE-21-AD, „Airworthiness
Directives; International Aero Engines AG (IAE) V25xx-xx Turbofan Engines”,
Federal Register Volume 71, Number 10, 17. Januar 2006, page 1-5.
23.1.3-5 M.W.Washo, „A Quick Method of Determining Root Causes and Corrective
Actions of Failed Ball Bearings“, Zeitschrift „Lubrication Engineering”, March 1996,
page 206-212.
23.1.3-6 P.A. Mucklow, „Engine Reliability Through Bearing Condition Monitoring“,
Paper von „South African Airways Symposium on Engine Monitoring”, 19-21 April
1983, page 1-8
23.1.3-7 C.A.Waggoner, „Detection and Diagnosis of Bearing Deterioration in Aircraft
Prop ulsionsystems by Wear Debris Analysis“, Zeitschrift „Lubrication Engineering”,
March 1996, page 2-1bis 2-13.
23.1.3-8 „Wälzlagerschäden, Schadenserkennung und Begutachtung gelaufener
Wälzlager“, FAG Publ. -Nr. WL 82 102 page 1-70.
23.1.3-9 E.Schreiber, „Werkstoffliche Schadensanalyse, ein Instrument zur Ermittlung
realer Beanspruchungsverhältnisse”, FAG Publikation, 13 pages. .
23.1.3-10 T.E.Tallian, „Failure Atlas for Hertz Contact Machine Elements“, ASME
Press, Chapter 7, page 99-181.
23.1.3-11 D.A.Frith, „Reliable Information From Engine Performance Monitoring”,
SAE Technical Paper Series 881444, Paper der „Aerospace Technology Conference and
Exposition, Anaheim, California, October 3-6, 1988, page 1-10.
23.1.3-12 H.Brenneke, „Early Failure Detection in Gas Turbine Aero Engines Using
Magnetic Plugs“, Zeitschrift „British Journal of NDT”, Vol 35, No2, February 1989, page 87-90.
23.1.3-13 O.Zwirlein, H.Schlicht, „Werkstoffanstrengung bei Wälzlagerbeanspruchung - Einfluss von Reibung und Eigenspannungen“, Zeitschrift „Werkstofftechnik”, 11, 1-4
(1980), page 1-14.
23.1.3-14 F.J.Ebert, W.Trojan, H.W.Zoch, „Hochaufgestickter, martensitischer
Wälzlagerstahl ist ermüdungsfest und korrosionsbeständig“, Zeitschrift „Wälzlagertechnik - Industrietechnik” Fa. FAG Kugelfischer, Ausgabe 1992-503DA, page 9-21.
23.1.3-15 „Investigation Team Identifies Causes of CF6-80 Problem“, Zeitschrift „Aviation
Week & Space Technology”, February 7, 1983, page 32.
23.1.3-16 D.P.Greby, „What turbine technology is teaching us about High-Speed Roller Bearings“,
ca. 1972, 6 pages.
23.1.3-17 B.A.Tassone, „Roller Bearing Slip and Skidding Damage”, Zeitschrift „J.
Aircraft“, Vol 12, No. 4, April 1975 , page 281-287.
23.1.3-18 „Wälzlager-Handbuch / Roller bearings handbook”, Fa. KRW, Edition 04/2003,
page 78-100.